• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 days ago

    I didn’t read the article but it seems off. With only 1/20 of energy used by the world in a single year we could undo the damage of 300 years?

    Seems too low. If that’s true we could shut down completely for just two weeks to undo

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Can’t imagine “shutting down completely for just two weeks” would exactly be reasonable, but yeah I wonder if the article had a typo in it. I’m not sure. As of right now, the numbers are still the same in the article.

      If the numbers are correct, expending like 5-10% of our energy expenditure for a single year on carbon capture sounds a lot more reasonable than the article suggests. Even if it were half of our yearly energy usage, that sounds pretty reasonable if you draw that out over a few decades.