• bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 days ago

      But of course! Real hardware or bust.

      This particular machine has been my daily driver for months now, so I would say it is faring quite well.

        • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          On this machine I have everything except for Bluetooth and the fingerprint reader, neither of which I ever use anyway.

          • aida@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            17 days ago

            something you can’t do or any inconvenience on this system?

            • bubstance@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Oh sure, lots of things are “inconvenient” on Plan 9.

              Of note for most would-be users: if you rely on a modern web browser like Firefox/Chrome, forget about it. Never going to happen.

              It’s important to remember that Plan 9 is fundamentally a research operating system; it’s not really a “typical” environment by any stretch, and that stems largely from it being entirely network-based and distributed. A single Plan 9 system in isolation can only be so interesting. Using it on a laptop like this can be an entirely different set of problems.

              If you’d like some examples of things you may face:

              • booting can be slow

              • can be intimidating to set up for some of the more important features – factotum(4) and secstore(1), new users and directories under /, etc.

              • cwfs is slow

              • hjfs is really slow

              • no multi-monitor support

              • only recently did we get a filesystem that specifically aims to be crash-safe

              • poor documentation, though it’s been getting better

              • reading research papers is basically a requirement for understanding the system

              • security is not a priority

              For me, though? I genuinely don’t need much more than what’s available in the base system.