Hi! Long time lurker, first time poster. Been discussing stuff with MLs of all stripes recently, and have come across a common statement used by a lot of Maoists which frustrates me.

They seem to always fall back on statements like “The CPC allows billionaires in their ranks, so they are revisionist.”

Maoists have often used this as a kind of “gotcha” argument against more traditional MLs, or “Dengists” as they love to label us.

It’s frustrating, because…I don’t disagree really, allowing members of the bourgeoisie to hold political power is pretty much the definition of revisionism. The problem is, this feels more like a way to silence dissent or discussion rather than facilitate it. Feels like an overly simplistic hard line that simplifies history into binary divisions. Often followed by an implied “China is revisionist, therefore Maoism is the only working form of socialism.”

I’m reaching out to people to see if anyone has any ways to combat this, in a way that encourages discussion rather than it just devolving into insults or truisms hurled back and forth without thought.

  • qwename@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The amendment to the constitution of the CPC in 2002 allowed “any advanced element of other social strata” to join the party, this was and still is controversial even among party members.

    Private entrepreneurs do not equate to capitalists, though they do attract the same negative sentiments due to capitalistic tendencies. There are national laws and party rules/regulations that prevent both civil servants and party-member leading cadres from holding posts in private enterprises. So private entrepreneurs can join the party, but cannot hold government or party posts unless they stop participating in private businesses.

    From Law of the People’s Republic of China on Civil Servants:

    Article 59 Civil servants shall abide by disciplinary rules and laws. They shall not commit any of the following acts:

    (16) Engaging or participating in for-profit activities and concurrently holding a post in enterprises or other for-profit organizations in violation of relevant regulations;

    • qwename@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Note that out of the 96.7 million CPC members (as of 2021), there are

      • 25.9 million farmers/herdsmen/fishermen
      • 15.5 million technical personnel
      • 10.9 million in management positions
      • 7.8 million party/government workers
      • 6.6 million skilled workers
      • 3.1 million students
      • 7.5 million in other professions
      • 19.4 million retired personnel

      Not saying that private entrepreneurs don’t have any voice, but they are a very small minority in both political representation and political power.