More than a quarter of Americans now claim no religious affiliation, a finding from the Pew Research Center. That makes the so-called “nones” the largest bloc of Americans. Judy Woodruff reports that for white Christians, the once-dominant group by far, there’s also been a growing political divide within communities as faith has receded. It’s for her latest installment of America at a Crossroads.
  • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    101·
    4 months ago

    Yes. They. All Christians. When the Golden God gets to sic goons on protesters to go across the street and hold an upside down Bible in front of a church, and Christians don’t ALL disavow him and his supporters…

    Then they ALL prove they’ve learned NOTHING from all of that religous “practice”. If being active in a religion means you do not speak out against actual, literal and present evil, you have LOST the plot. Entirely. Completely.

    The evangelicals that support Trump should’ve been ACTIVELY shunned by the rest of Chriatianity. Literally labeled believers in evil. Satan followers. But you all only seem to practice that “do not judge” business when it comes to outright evil people! Nono, the LGBTQ+ community is going to Hell, but Trump deserves forgiveness!

    Give me a break… Christians who “need” church are some of the scummiest people on this planet.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        2·
        4 months ago

        There are billions of Christians… and most of them are on the dumber side of humanity.

        Remember, there are billions MORE of non-Christians. I spoke of actual things Christians ACTUALLY DO, … and your defense is, “butbut there are a lot of them!” Yes. There IS a lot of morons in the world. You have proven nothing except that you want to biased for Christians.

        • koavf@lemmy.mlOP
          12·
          4 months ago

          You think that a majority of humans are dumber than most humans, which says about as much as I think I need to know about your critical thinking skills.

          My defense (defense of what?) was not “butbut there are a lot of them!” (why did you use “there are” and then “there is” in subsequent sentences?). Rather than defending anything, I was pointing out how you wrote something stupid. The larger the group you are talking about, the less precise you can be and the less likely what you are saying is accurate. You managed to choose one of the largest targets you possibly could demographically and wrote a sweeping generalization which is just stupid. I don’t have to defend anything: you have to defend writing something so stupid and you can’t because it’s just stupid. You write stupid things.