Doug Holland@lemmy.world to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.world · 1 year ago10 years ago, this judge ruled NYPD was wrong on stop-and-frisk. Now she worries it's coming back.gothamist.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down13
arrow-up170arrow-down1external-link10 years ago, this judge ruled NYPD was wrong on stop-and-frisk. Now she worries it's coming back.gothamist.comDoug Holland@lemmy.world to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareThatsTheSpirit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoUnless you can afford a lawyer, Stop and frisk is the norm.
minus-squareAPassenger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoIf they can’t provide a RAS, then it is unconstitutional. They can try to make one up, but that’s where the body cameras are supposed to help.
minus-squareDoug Holland@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t disagree that you’re right and it’s unconstitutional, but in actual day-to-day law enforcement, the constitution is pretty far in the background.
minus-squareThatsTheSpirit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYa that’s not how it works lol.
Unless you can afford a lawyer, Stop and frisk is the norm.
If they can’t provide a RAS, then it is unconstitutional.
They can try to make one up, but that’s where the body cameras are supposed to help.
I don’t disagree that you’re right and it’s unconstitutional, but in actual day-to-day law enforcement, the constitution is pretty far in the background.
Ya that’s not how it works lol.