The nearest abortion clinic – in Chicago – was too far away and too expensive for her mother to provide her with the procedure

  • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Dude, I’m not even from the US. My question is, in my opinion, an obvious one, at least to an outsider to the US political system. Why do you have to vote him again, when he’s in power now?

    • derpo@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      His presidential subscription needs to be re-upped every Summer Olympics

      • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Of which he had 4 in total to do something about abortions, so I fail to see how that’s an adequate answer

        • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Well that’s different than what you asked before but ok. The president doesn’t create new laws. That’s the job of the legislature. Currently the republicans hold more seats in the house and in the senate there’s 48 Dem, 49 Rep, and 3 Ind. So not likely to produce anything about abortion other than trying to ban it. It doesn’t look like anyone else is going to be a real contender to run in Biden’s place and anyone from the republican side would clearly be worse and would greenlight any anti-abortion bills that legislature would try to pass. So the obvious and adequate answer is that when Biden’s term is up we are going to have to vote for him again because there are no better options and the legislature is not in a state that will work to protect pro-choice rights but is in a state where it could try to limit those rights. Also, Biden was sworn in on Jan 20th 2021 so he hasn’t had 4 years yet.

        • Matt_Shatt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s a classic case of maintaining the status quo. He may not be able to codify abortion protection but he can at least stop the R’s from doing it.