• Successful_Try543@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Some sites don’t work with ad blockers enabled. Yes, one can avoid those as much as possible, but some small maintainer of neat online services (no, not Google, Meta, MS, …) also need their bills payed. So ads without tracking, i.e. collection of personal data, imho are a toad to swallow.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Some sites don’t work with ad blockers enabled.

      Some foods taste bad. One simply eats different foods.

      some small maintainer of neat online services (no, not Google, Meta, MS, …) also need their bills payed.

      If they can’t afford to host it at no cost to the user then they should charge for it.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        If they can’t afford to host it at no cost to the user then they should charge for it.

        That’s a lot more complex than displaying some ads.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s also more respectful to users and doesn’t create perverse incentives or invite third party ad servers to give their customers malware.