• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Literally yes, it is, in plenty of scenarios. Smoking, for example, causes cancer. So if you get cancer as a result of smoking… that was preventable.

      And deaths from cancer even more so. A lot of cancers can be extremely survivable if caught early.

      Although the article talks about much more than just cancer.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh. Good to know lung cancer is only caused by smoking. I’ll let the doctors know, thanks.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          Again you’re trying to sound clever but instead sounding… well… I’ll let you work that one out on your own.

          I didn’t say lung cancer was only caused by smoking. I said smoking causes cancer (and not just in the lungs, btw).

        • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They didn’t say cancer was only a result of smoking, but that smoking could cause cancer. You beat down a scarecrow of their argument, well done /s