So I have a situation. I really want to switch to Linux as my main gaming/production OS but need the Adobe suite as I am a graphic designer. Adobe is the golden standard for this industry (and likely to always be) so while Gimp and Inkscape might work, they are not feasible for my career. I also know that there will be situations where games just don’t run well or at all on Linux.

Dualbooting works but is not really worth it for me as I would have to stop what I’m doing and restart my PC. I heard that you can set up a single GPU passthrough for games and software but it seems complicated. How difficult would that be to set up for a new user to Linux? I would consider myself a tech savvy person but I know very little about the ins and outs of Linux. I have a massive GPU (XFX RX 6900 XT) with a big support bracket that covers the second PCIE slot so buying another GPU isn’t really feasible either.

I do have an Unraid server with decent specs that I use for a hosting Minecraft servers and Jellyfin so setting up a VM on that might be a good option.

What would you guys recommend me to do?

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Best option: Use Linux and alternatives to Adobe stuff, if possible. These programs continue to evolve, at some point you might not need the Adobe stuff anymore.

    Second best option: Use Linux and run the Adobe stuff inside a Windows VM. GPU passthrough is not that difficult to configure if you need it. You can run your Windows games on Linux in many cases, so it’s most likely not needed to run a Windows VM with GPU passthrough just for gaming.

    Third best option: Use OS X instead of Windows or Linux, and run the Adobe stuff on OS X (it’s also natively supported there)

    Worst option: Continue to use Windows

    • looz@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re ignoring that adobe software also evolves. FOSS alternatives have never caught up.

      • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t ignoring it. What matters is whether the software supports the features you NEED. That there will always be more features added, doesn’t mean that you need all those. What matters is whether the software is “feature-complete” for your specific needs. Look at MS Office. It’s the “industry standard” office suite (that term sucks btw, just means most popular), yet it has features that the majority of people do not need at all (probably even don’t know those exist). So, LibreOffice or OnlyOffice for example can be viable replacements in such cases. You get what you need out of your office suite AND you have it in FOSS format with 100% user control, without a company stealing sensitive info from your documents in the background.