As long as you have adblockers, what does it matter? I get the “no clicks” kind of protest, but that only works if they’re able to serve ads. If you remove the ads, then they’re not getting the impression, which ultimately means they’re paying for you to visit the site.
Balance doesn’t mean giving equal platform to every racist bigot though, there has to be a line drawn somewhere. Wikipedia doesn’t accept the Mail as a source, personally I don’t think it should be accepted here.
deleted by creator
The Guardian has a similar misleading article.
I mean I’m not really a fan myself, but it can’t all be alternating BBC and Guardian stories.
BBC, AP, Reuters or gtfo
Daily mail smh
I could not find this story on the BBC news app, but I did hear about it on Radio 4.
As long as you have adblockers, what does it matter? I get the “no clicks” kind of protest, but that only works if they’re able to serve ads. If you remove the ads, then they’re not getting the impression, which ultimately means they’re paying for you to visit the site.
They’re a bunch of xenophobic, racist shit-stirring cunts, not a news source
sort of, but its political innit. Its far better for everyone to avoid the skip fire than jump on in.
Balance doesn’t mean giving equal platform to every racist bigot though, there has to be a line drawn somewhere. Wikipedia doesn’t accept the Mail as a source, personally I don’t think it should be accepted here.
Well we could start including lad bible posts.
Oh, or the free Metro