• BreadOven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article says at that point ('96) a lethal dose would take 500 seconds of exposure. Still not good though.

      • max
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is, though this deposit of Corium is called the elephant’s foot due to its shape.

      • Jakylla@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, actually “Corium” is a word that was made for the occasion, meaning “Element made by the core of nuclear reactor”; the elephant’s foot is that particular blob of corium that is under Chernobyl’s reactor

  • lurker7141@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So that guy definitely got a lethal dose of radiation, right? I thought a couple minutes near that thing meant certain death.

    • BreadOven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to an article posted in the comments, this was in '96 and it was emitting 10 times less radiation. It says over 500 seconds would be lethal.

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still, that close and without full face coverage. I certainly wouldn’t want to be there.

        • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you think that the suit he’s wearing somehow protects against the gamma radiation and neutrons screaming through his body? It’s just to keep from tracking dust / tiny radioactive particles.

        • BreadOven@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Definitely agreed. The article said he just took a quick reading while the picture was taken. Apparently no long term effects would happen from the little exposure, but I’m not sure their reference for that.

          Either way, the further away to it from me, the better.

    • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      No; that photo is from 1996 (a decade after the incident) where the vast majority of short lived fission products are well into their decay chains.

      It’s not safe to be around it for a long period now (and it still wasn’t then), but it’d take at least a few minutes of getting up close and personal with it to see any short term effects.

      FWIW NYT interviewed him in 2014. He may have since passed (I didn’t look it up) but certainly not as a result of acute radiation exposure.

      Fun fact: the film had to be exposed for several seconds for each of the images in this series due to the low light levels, which contributes to the amount of radiation ‘fuzz’ in the images. Think 1800s camera levels of staying still for a photo, just in front of a giant radioactive chunk of corium.

      • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why didn’t they just bring bigger lights I wonder? Space constraints? Is this sitting inside a collapsed basement?

    • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That appears to be the Elephant’s foot in Chernobyl. When it was first discovered it apparently could cause radiation poisoning within 4 minutes.

      That being said, the half life decay of the elephant’s foot has been going on for awhile. Artur Korneyev, who took photographs appears to be alive to this day.