• buffaloboobs@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Calling it that makes it sound like a fun whoopsy rather than what it is: a tactic to squeeze a few more dollars out of customers, while intentionally obscuring what the buyer is getting. More like gambling/loot boxes. And they don’t care if people at Walmart are tearing up their product. Lego already got paid, it’s the stores that are losing.

    Really it’s just a scummy business practice. Add to the fact that they now own bricklink, so they’re making, what, 3% back on each resale?

    If it’s not crystal clear, I really hate this practice. And now, with them taking it a step further in the wrong direction, just makes me more okay with buying less. Which sucks, because I really like this series. But I can’t support shit like this.

    • TechyDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      In my case, it means I’ll be buying less from them. If they were in the bags, I’d have gone to the LEGO store with my older son (who has a 95%+ success rate at feeling figures in the bags) and would have gotten all the figures I wanted.

      Now, I’m going to buy a 6 pack (to ensure no dupes) and if I don’t get everyone I want them oh well. Maybe I’ll buy the others from BrickLink, but likely not.

      On the other hand, it might finally give me the kick in the rear to start a local “minifigure trading group.” If I got two Wolverines and someone else has an extra Moon Knight, we could swap so we each get closer to a complete set. (It would need to be local because the cost of shipping the figures back and forth wouldn’t make it worth while - not to mention keeping people honest about actually shipping figures instead of getting a figure and then ghosting.)