• thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Enter Nintendo. Crappy 9yo SOC, sure, whatever, here are some fun games that aren’t graphically advanced.

    • averyminya@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      The console wars have always been between Sony and Microsoft. Nintendo does the innovation side of things

      • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, it was Coleco/Atari - Coleco lost

        Then Nintendo/Atari - Atari lost

        Then Sega/Nintendo

        Then Sega/Nintendo/Sony - Sega lost

        Then Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft - Nintendo lost, but pivoted to play a different game.

        Then you can throw things in there like 3DO and Jaguar Turbo FX, but they didn’t do so got to be considered contenders in the “war”

        • averyminya@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sorry, I meant console wars of graphical fidelity from my memory. I don’t remember it mattering as much when I was young, but I could be wrong still.

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You must be younger than me. I grew up in the 90s and the Sega/Nintendo rivalry was intense.

            I think it was the SNES/Genesis era when “who has the better graphics” started to matter.

            At the time, I was actually of the opinion that the N64 was a step down from the SNES. Sure the graphics were 3D, but they looked like shit even then. Nintendo really fucked up by sticking with cartridges that generation.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        If by always you mean the last 15-20 years, plenty more warring from the likes of Nintendo and Sega before then!

        • averyminya@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Console fidelity wars, from my understanding when I was growing up the improvements in graphics were appreciated but not the sole aspect of whether a game was good, like the way 2005-2025 (and somewhat into 2025 but significantly less so) did

    • warm@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also Nintendo: They are $70. Want an old game? Also $70. Sales? What are those?

      Consoles are such a scam when you think about it, but their low barrier to entry carries them (along with the marketing of course).

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They don’t have asmany sales, but I’ve definitely scored some good prices on games here and there. They often run 20+% off on first party titles and non-first party gets deep discounts (I scored Rabbids for $4 a while back). I just wish they’d do the equivalent of PS Greatest Hits for like $20.

        For some situations a console is nicer than a PC. Solid, consistent, single unit I can just connect to a TV and play. I’ve got a PC and I prefer it, but the average console is cheaper than my PC was and simpler for non-geek family members to boot up and play on a whim.