• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Large” and “1 Megawatt” seems like a contradiction.

  • perestroika@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Interesting. Not necessarily practical, but unusual.

    I had heard about iron flow batteries which also change the oxidation level of iron, but not about burning iron powder and reverting the rust to iron using hydrogen.

    I think electrochemistry has better prospects in warm climates, where you most likely cannot sell the heat. Burning and converting heat into anything always has a penalty in terms of efficiency - but can get high power densities. In cold climates where reaction heat is a useful thing to consumers - maybe.

  • PondSkimmer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a cool concept. There are definitely possible issues that need to be hammered out, but I like seeing diverse ideas for energy production! Thanks for sharing!

  • weg@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder the energy cost of creating the powdered iron. And of converting iron oxide back to iron powder.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      AFAIK it is not the most efficient, but can be done with surplus electricity from wind farms for example.

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Current (pilot test scale) electrical iron reduction is a bit more efficient than commercial hydrogen electrolysis. It may have some as-yet-unknown barriers to commercialisation though.