• Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Consoles are dying. Thanks to them becoming locked pre-built PCs. So why just get a PC at that point.

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      I disagree. I think they’re dying because big publishers have become so risk averse. It takes forever for a game to be finished and when it’s done it’s usually forgettable slop, with a few exceptions. PC gaming allows for different tiers of games to be developed more easily so there’s more variety.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol.

      We’ll file this under the same prediction bracket as those who thought PC gaming was dying in the early 2000s.

      • Kelly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The cycle I see is aligned with the console generations.

        For the first half of the gen the console proposition is reasonably modern and some people with older PCs will pick up a console instead of a new PC build.

        For the second half of the gen the console proposition is dated and PCs can achieve the same power for a modest price, or exceed that power for a few dollars more. Some people will switch to PC either as an upgrade or when their current console fails.

        Then the cycle continues every 6 or 7 years.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          In my experience very few people replace a PC, even an old one, with a console. At most people might buy a console in addition to their PC and that just becomes less and less viable as each console generation is more expensive and closer to the price of a new PC anyway.