• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Important addition: don’t just shut the fuck up.

    First, in some jurisdictions, failure to identify is an arrestable offense. Full name, date of birth, relevant cards/papers.

    Second, if you need to reach for something, say something so they don’t think you’re about to pull a weapon on them. Officer safety is always a concern in the land of handing out guns like candy.

    Third, explicitly state that you are exercising your fifth amendment rights. Otherwise you might run into an “I want a lawyer, dawg” situation.

    • helenslunch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      in some jurisdictions, failure to identify is an arrestable offense

      There’s nowhere in the US that is true without reasonable, articulable suspicion (Terry v Ohio)

      explicitly state that you are exercising your fifth amendment rights.

      You really don’t need to do that unless you’ve already started answering questions, but it is good practice.

      • fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Keep in mind that the cops don’t have to provide you with their reasonable suspicion in order to demand ID. It’s not until court that they have to provide their reasonable suspicion. So they have plenty of time to come up with justification after the fact.

        Also, on the Fifth Amendment I thought I had read somewhere about a case where a man simply remained silent and never once invoked his right and it didn’t end well for him. I cannot remember the details, but for some reason I thought that you still had to invoke the fifth even if you have not yet answered any questions. I’ll have to look back into this later and post back if I find the story.

        • helenslunch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So they have plenty of time to come up with justification after the fact.

          Sure, if they have any.

          I thought I had read somewhere about a case where a man simply remained silent and never once invoked his right and it didn’t end well for him.

          Yeah the footnote from that case was that he started answering questions and then clammed up later. For some reason that doesn’t work.