• catsup@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 天前

    rofl at this title trying to victimize google for being monopolistic assholes

    • Sestren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 天前

      How does the title victimize Google?.. It literally just summarizes the article, and then in the first sentence of the actual article they flat out call Google an illegal monopoly.

      • catsup@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 天前

        “Must crack open”

        crack open has negative connotations. “Must allow” is a much more neutral way to phrase it.

        “Epic Judge”

        The judge isn’t epic’s, it’s just the judge that happens to be dealing with this case.

        • vrek@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 小时前

          Ok, they got me on the second one… I was seriously wondering how epic had their own judge and it wasn’t conflict of interest.

          • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 小时前

            Welcome to America, where the judges might as well wear racing suits full of sponsors. Actually, that might be an improvement on the status quo.