Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up11.12Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square137fedilink
minus-squareswitchboard_pete@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down3·1 month agothe answers here assume that the base is a continuous, straight line given one of the angles on the left triangle is a right angle on the diagram, but 80 if you calculate it, you can’t assume that
minus-squarebrisk@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·1 month agoThis is a standard way to draw geometric proofs, it’s not at all unreasonable to assume straight lines and unrepresentative angles.
minus-squareswitchboard_pete@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 month agonormally in a geometric proof, a right angle is a right angle
minus-squarebrisk@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 month agoThis was certainly not my experience in high school. An unlabelled angle could never be assumed. Only angles marked with a square could be taken as right angles.
the answers here assume that the base is a continuous, straight line
given one of the angles on the left triangle is a right angle on the diagram, but 80 if you calculate it, you can’t assume that
This is a standard way to draw geometric proofs, it’s not at all unreasonable to assume straight lines and unrepresentative angles.
normally in a geometric proof, a right angle is a right angle
This was certainly not my experience in high school. An unlabelled angle could never be assumed. Only angles marked with a square could be taken as right angles.
guess you’re right!