• InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sure, but Steam sells the licenses and holds them for you in your account, so it does not quite answer the question. To me they still have all the same issues other platforms that deal in licensing have. Steam just has better PR and is not overtly a dick the way others have been.

      • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And to get ahead of a new law they passed in California, they’re already putting it on the screen before check out that you’re buying a license to the game, not the game itself. Of course, I think just like Prop65, it will be too broad. Prop65 is the law that says that anything with even a trace amount of carcinogens has to have a warning that announces the presence of carcinogens.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          That, and there is no penalty for giving a false positive warning although there is for noncompliance. So manufacturers will just stick a Prop 65 label on everything rather than put forth the brainpower required to verify if any of their products or materials sourced from any of their innumerable suppliers and subcontractors might actually contain a chemical from the naughty list or not. Therefore the label becomes less than meaningless.