• TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    For all the left people I know, including myself, The reason we don’t want a line drawn is because sometimes special circumstances arise. There may be medical complications in the third trimester that would result in the mother’s death and it’s not feasible to exhaustively list every scenario that could land her in this situation so it’s better to just not a put a limit on it so she doesn’t have some bullshit hoop to jump through later while she’s dying.

    That said, I don’t think there’s anyone genuinely arguing that people should be allowed to get abortions super late into the pregnancy just for funsies. Third trimester is the logical cut off to me, and most of the people I know agree or want it slightly shorter. We just don’t want the law to specify that since it can cause legal complications. It’s better that it be considered a medical standard.

    • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think that drawing a line means it wouldn’t be allowed under any circumstances after that. Before the line, it would be at the mother’s discretion, and after passing the line, you’d need a statement from one or two doctors and a valid medical reason for it.

      Where I live abortion is legal untill 12 weeks and after that you need a medical reason for it and a statement from 2 doctors. What’s wrong with this?

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You need to prove you’re going to die to 2 different doctors? Sounds like you need to be lucky which is exactly what we don’t want.

        • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          How do you know you’re going to die due to pregnancy without visiting a doctor? You’re not going there to prove anything. You’re going there for a diagnosis. Doctor is the medical expert, not the mother.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That doctor also needs to have it confirmed by another doctor though? Seems odd, and also sounds like the perfect way to deny abortions to women who need them.

            • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              I don’t know what hellhole you live in, but where I’m from, doctors don’t arbitrarily deny abortions to someone whose life is in danger. The reason you need a second opinion is because you had three months to decide whether you want to keep it or not. If it’s been more than that, the child is already so far developed that you’ll need a medical reason to abort it, and at that point, ‘I changed my mind’ is no longer a good enough reason to end the life of a living, feeling being. Also, after that point you generally also need surgery to remove the dead fetus.

              • Zoot@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 minutes ago

                You must be lucky to not live in one of the many American states which have laws actively causing many women to die.