• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      It doesn’t matter if virality is the goal, unless you’re suggesting it be actively prevented, virality is just a natural phenomenon of the internet. The term viral generally implies uncontrolled exponential spread. To this day, stuff goes viral without people intending it to.

      And if you architect the system to scale a p2p network proportional to virality (ex. as people share it, they also self-host) you run into a ton of security and abuse challenges. We’re also stretching the definition of “self-hosting” at this point.

      • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 minutes ago

        Self hosting isn’t really compatible with viral content

        The post I was replying to claimed virality and self hosting are at odds with one another because it causes skyrocketing expense. My point was that maybe someone selfhosting a server in the fediverse is not as interested in virality. And I doubt even the most viral posts in the fediverse would break the bank of a selfhoster

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      We are talking about a TikTok alternative. If getting as many people as possible to see your stuff isn’t your goal, then why would you post it in the first place?
      Making your content go viral is pretty much literally the only point.

      • 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Virality is nowhere near the only reason for posting videos. People post them to make jokes, teach something, reply to someone else, etc, or all the same reasons someone might make a blogpost or a post on a link aggregator.