The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

    • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Eh, keeping car traffic smooth is way more challenging than keeping pedestrian traffic smooth. Also people tend to be more chaotic in there direction than cars. If a car stops in front of you you’re sorta stuck if a human stops in front of you you can always bash him in the head with a bar stool or go around or whatever.

      I know it was auto manufacturers lobbying for the law but can you imagine people just randomly darting across an interstate moving at 80+ mph? I can because I have seen it before and not once have I thought wow I sure am glad that’s legal.

      • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I think you might have picked a bad community to share your sympathies for smooth car traffic, I’m afraid.

        For what it’s worth, I think it’s reasonable enough to forbid pedestrians from crossing high-speed (60+ mph) roads, but otherwise they should have full right of way over any road, and fuck the cars. They can just be patient and deal with it.

        • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Maybe, but the alternative is unrealistic and simply not the reality we Live in.(at least in the United States)

          • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That’s how every progressive movement starts, until activists make them reality. If it’s a good idea, it’s a good idea - and if that’s not the way that things are done, the question stops being “is this a good idea”, and starts being “how can we implement this good idea”.

        • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          But what if those roads didn’t have to exist at all. We could replace those with dedicated high speed rail corridors.

        • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I still can primarily because I live in Texas, it is not at all uncommon, not even on the interstate, though 40mph work zone going into school zones it happens regularly.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        The entire concept of a car is a scam from manufacturing to driving it. Source: Former car mechanic who has hated cars since before it was cool.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What, wait, no. I’ve lived in very rural areas, wtf was I supposed to do without a car? Bike back and forth a few hours for groceries?

            • Lightor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              So people should only live in dense, crowded cities? Because even in the suburbs it’s not possible to grocery shop without a car.

      • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I will never be sad when car brains like you learn the hard way that cars are nothing but weapons. This is exactly why cars should be completely illegal, full stop.

        • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Ok, Let’s assume you are perfectly correct in every way, Now according to your hypothesis Cars have no purpose other than being a weapon, now since cars exist at least for the moment, it is probably for the best to make it illegal to dash across shooting ranges.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            You see, here’s the problem. It’s not actually a shooting range. Streets weren’t made for cars, but for people. Before cars you’d see humans, carriages, horses, etc. all coexisting within the same space.

            • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              You think in a legally licensed clearly posted shooting rang someone darting through the range illegally should be allowed to retaliate?