What I mean by this is that I’ve talked to tons of libs, usually white, who’ll look at and/or interact with me as a black, androgynous transfem, and they’ll say shit like, “I really hope Kamala gets in office for real, though. I don’t agree with her position on Gaza, but Trump’s gonna do so much damage if he gets elected for a second time!”

And I just nod my head along to it. I don’t say a word of explicit agreement or disagreement. If I said that I disagree and that I’m not voting for Kamala, then in usual lib fashion, they’ll see it the same level of absurdity as me saying, “I’m a black non-binary transfeminine Trump supporter. I’m like an even more colorful spin on Blaire White! MAGA! You mad, woke liberal SJW mob?” trollface

They’re so out of touch that they can’t fathom why, to any degree, a person like me would be so opposed to supporting the “99% Hitler” party, and 99% is even charitable. That’s why they always assume that any leftist who’s not voting for Harris is just a cishet white dude who doesn’t understand the plight of the marginalized, and if you’re not a cishet white dude and you reveal to these libs that you don’t support Harris, you’ll have many scratched liberal moments, of course. Speaking from experience!

  • drake@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    if you fucking leftists were smart you’d all agree with me, because i’m smart and i did a math that 99 is less than 100, that’s why im going to make the ethical choice, and vote for 99% hitler

    Seriously I saw a comment the other day that was like, “Someone should explain utilitarianism to them”, like we all somehow discuss marxist theory without an understanding of baby’s first philosophical framework