Donald Trump reportedly used a bail bondsman after being arrested at Fulton County Jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Thursday, paying $20,000 of his bond set at $200,000 and taking out a loan for the rest of it. The fact that the former president resorted to such a measure has sparked questions on social media about the state of his finances.
That’s not how bail bonds works. It’s not a loan. You pay the bondsman 10%. Then the bondsman guarantees that the defendant will show up to his court dates. If the defendant fails to show up the bondsman has to pay the court the entire amount. Bondsman often use bounty hunters to pick up defendants who haven’t shown up.
I am not American, so it might be the phrasing that confuses me.
But is the 10% returned to the defendant? Or that’s a flat fee that the bondsman take?
If that is the latter, then I understand why people are questioning why Trump is using a bondsman since he supposedly have the cash to cover the full bond that he will get back once he shows up.
So either he plans to fuck off so he saved 90% of his bond, or he’s having cashflow issues.
If it’s the former, then it make total sense to use a bondsman regardless of your fortune.
The 10% is payment to the bondsman. They keep it.
Then people definitely have to question why a supposed billionaire is using a bondsman.
Exactly, if he actually had the money and doesn’t plan on skipping town, then he should have no problem putting that money up. I see a lot of people saying he’s not above running away, but I really don’t think his ego would let him. I think he truly believes he can beat the charges or win the election first, despite all the losses he’s already had.
You can consider the 10% as “interest” since the bondsman would have to cover the rest of the bail in case the indictee doesn’t show up
And they get their pay normally by keeping the 10% from the defendant. If the defendant skips town, they lose the other 90% unless they can locate the defendant and get them back to court.
It pretty much is
I’m curious, does the bondsman actually give the court cash, or just guarantee that they will if the defendant doesn’t show? And if that is the case, do they bond out more people than they actually have cash to cover, knowing that it is unlikely that they’ll ever have to cover all those positions?
Someone correct me, but I think it’s dependent on the court. But either way, that’s why they generally employ bounty hunters to track down the defendants to make sure they don’t have to pay the court the rest.