When mindlessly browsing Reddit, I found that I usually just jump directly to the comments, read a couple, and continue. Lemmy seems a bit more curated (read: smaller), and therefore it’s easier to actually engage in discussions, which leads me to read the article, think critically about it, and respond (if I have something to say) in the comments–bigger is not always better!

  • nsfwacc_burner@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think at this point there should be a LLM extension which does it quickly for you everytime you end up on an article.

    • jadero@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m torn.

      Yes, article summaries can be nice, and often demonstrate just how unnecessarily wordy the original is.

      On the other hand, not needing to follow links to the original is at least part of what’s killing original creators, especially journalists and their outlets. As much as we dislike ads, subscriptions, and requests for donations, those are what fund the sources we most cherish.

      • mr_washee_washee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        there are too much journalists. if they agree to consolidate into less numerous news outlets and share a universal pay to read platform (the same concept of flipboard), i would gladly pay/or allow ad playback. but they agreed to disagree, they now must bear the consequences.