• Noxvento@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whenever I have a tech problem, I add reddit to google search. That’s the only way to get good answers from google. This worked great until their API scam.

    After switching to the fediverse, I should also replace Google. But with what?

    • Gorroth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I switched to Duckduckgo recently. So far it works good and gives me helpful results. Can’t give long time Test results, using it since a week. But I think it gets the job done.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was very happy am that Apple added it as a default option in iOS. I had been using it off and on for years but now it’s been my default in various browsers for I guess about 3-4 years. Generally I find what I want with no problem, but still need to append !g and get the results from Google for some searches. Maybe about 10%, and more often on image searches.

        • Gorroth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is really good to hear! I also added it as default search engine in safari and brave since I switched. Thought I have to go full in in order to give it a chance. Where exactly do you add the „!g“?

          • zeppo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Anywhere in the search string works, and then it redirects you to google.

            Oh, and the feature is called “bangs”. I knew there were a good handful of them but apparently there are a ton! Over 13,000?

            https://duckduckgo.com/bangs

          • Almighty5617@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The “!g” is part of something called “bangs” on DuckDuckGo. Bangs are prefixes to redirect your query to another search engine. For example “!g How to pet a cat” will redirect you to Google, searching for “How to pet a cat”

            Other useful bangs are “!m” for maps, “!gi” for Google images, “!so” for stack overflow.

            You can find more about it at the bangs page: https://duckduckgo.com/bangs

    • Gex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      After switching to the fediverse, I should also replace Google.

      Not necessarily. One step to a better internet at a time. Sometimes people get overwhelmed by free software solutions because they try to do everything at once.

      But with what?

      I’ve tried a lot but replacing google search is not easy. You can of course use a meta search engine like searx which is great but then you hand your search traffic directly to some random instance owner. You could also use startpage which is basically a firewall for google search. duckduckgo does work and I use it sometimes but the search results are definitely worse than google’s. The bangs are a nice feature though.

      • aqf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think DuckDuckGo has gotten way better, and Google has gotten way worse. I tend to use DG for most search needs and then append !g to go to Google if the search doesn’t meet my needs.

      • 🅱🅴🅿🅿🅸@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was using ddg for a while but got fed up with the kinda shit results… swapped over to brave search and it seems much better, but not 100% sure if it’s got the privacy behind it like ddg does… have you got any experience with brave search?

    • oaschbeidl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m thinking of giving Ecosia another go, since I really appreciate their whole “use the whole net income to plant trees” thing. Just gotta check out how well their algorithm does at this point.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is slightly confusing to me why everyone was insisting ChatGPT was a threat to Google and that it would replace Google search. They don’t seem like comparable products.

        • rtfm_modular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you imagine users asking questions to Google just to recieve a bunch of crappy listicles or the wiki page, versus ChatGPT, it makes more sense.

          ChatGPT enables you to have a dialogue to ask follow up questions, more detail or summarize information in two sentences. Google can’t compete with that using a page-rank algorithm alone. It is incredibly powerful and it’s getting exponentially better.

          I’d caution anyone who just dismisses it by calling it a chatbot or says it hallucinates too much. I found the accuracy between 3.5 to 4 pretty astonishing to the point where I now fear the AGI apocalypse.

      • Carnelian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly for certain things that I was already knowledgable about, it provided a really great and accurate summary when I asked. Other times not so much, so I don’t feel comfortable using it for research like that.

        I think if it could base its output on real sources and direct you to them it would be a bit better

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hah. Imagine if you went to Wikipedia and had to account for that 40% of all info on there was straight made up. Like the Scots wikipedia.