• eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah it’s really strange. I’m not a fan of MS by any means, but I’ve found myself making so many pro-MS comments on Lemmy just because the userbase leans so heavily pro-Linux and anti-MS.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lemmy and other Fediverse sites tend to attract folks who prefer FOSS. Early Reddit was that way too!

    • ebits21@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It shouldn’t be that strange. Linux nerds are a huge Lemmy demographic.

      Much more up on new technology, FOSS, and privacy issues etc. than the general population. Good fit for Lemmy.

    • visak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      And then getting downvoted by people who just disagree with your opinion. I’m one of the Reddit refugees so I don’t know if we brought that with us or Lemmy was like that before but it’s sad to see.

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s why downvote buttons exist? If you want to express your opinion on the internet, go ahead, but you should be prepared for the possibility that it might not be a popular opinion.

        • visak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s just that it’s boring. I’d rather have an interesting debate. Downvoting everything you simply disagree with just leads to groupthink forums.

          • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Those downvotes aren’t stopping you from having a discussion. They’re just hurting your pride.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Downvote buttons are meant to be used for comments that don’t contribute to the discussion or are plainly completely wrong, not for opinions you disagree with. But most people can’t stand being disagreed with on things they feel passionately about, so they will still downvote where they merely disagree.

        • funchords@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s why downvote buttons exist?

          No (and not downvoted) … it’s about controlling visibility.

          https://join-lemmy.org/docs/users/03-votes-and-ranking.html

          My take: Upvote the stuff other people should see. Downvote the stuff that should have never been here at all. You don’t have to agree or disagree, you can even have no opinion. But if you find it worthwhile to others, upvote it. Detrimental, downvote it.

          • visak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Maybe there should be four buttons:

            • Upvote-good comment
            • Upvote-agree
            • Downvote-disagree
            • Downvote-unhelpful/rude

            Which could be used for more filtering options.

            Or maybe a separate agreement/disagree metric. I wouldn’t mind seeing the consensus on a topic separate from the measure of usefulness.