The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

    • Big Miku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      So what’s the difference between lead, tungsten, and depleted uranium? They all cause cancer and other symptoms, and both tungsten and depleted uranium must be decontaminated if the tank carrying them is destroyed.

      And from what I’ve read you will die of the toxicity before you will die of the radiation.

      • Grimble [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So youre telling us there’s an even more deadly aspect than the radiation, and youre still defending this like your life depends on it, huh?

        I thought liberals had a rule against bending science to fit political agendas. Guess that’s another lie you tell yourselves

        • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Depleted Uranium isn’t radioactive, really. U-238, stripped of all the U-235 (hence, depleted) is incredibly stable. While it is technically radioactive, it barely registers. So maybe learn what you’re talking about?