• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    {Long ChatGPT-like diatribe that was ignored}

    Ah, here’s something I can actually reply to…

    The reason it’s not done is not that investing in automation doesn’t have a gigantic ROI, it’s that it’s too long-term for capital to care.

    No one said anything about automation. We were talking about a human being switching for one operating system to another and learning a new tool/program that will save them money in the long run, versus being short-sighted, or as they used to say, “penny-wise, and pound foolish”.

    Your position, as I understood it, was that it should never be done because it’s not cost beneficial, it’s cost prohibited. I was trying to get a qualifier from you of if you thought that was true for just short-term gains, or both short-term and long-term gains.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I explained why it’s not done. I’m not saying that the system is good.

      The existing short-term and long-term incentive structure is what it is. That’s the material conditions we’re dealing with. Don’t like them? Become a revolutionary, but don’t stand there and pretend they don’t exist as if users are frictionless, spherical cows floating in platonic space.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They don’t exist, not in the way you’re trying to apply them to this situation and the question I asked. Your just strawmanning.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ok I’ll humour you. If the material conditions aren’t as I described them to be, then what are they, in your opinion? What’s the cause? Why aren’t companies rushing to switch over their operations?