• wtf_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    hot take but nobody under 18 should be allowed on any form of social media or internet forum

    but there’s no way to enforce that. better solution is to just get rid of all social media

    • AZzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a kid myself, I should not be agreeing. I’ve seen so many young people destroy internet spaces or just make everything worse… I’m just glad I wasn’t part of that as much as other people may have been.

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kinda with you on that. It’s been a long time since I’ve been a kid (born in '85) but looking back, if the internet of the '90s were like it is today, I do not think it would have been OK for me to access it. Everything changed. It’s a lot more dangerous than it ever used to be. There used to be a much more robust barrier between online and real life. Whatever happened on the internet never mattered until suddenly shit got as real as a heart attack. There was a time when the internet didn’t have a body count. Isn’t that fucking nuts? Once upon a time, death threats on the internet were nothing but empty words spat by impotent children who couldn’t bring it about. NOW? You can get straight up fucking murdered by someone who gets mad enough on the internet because anger is a motivator and those with the motivation can doxx just about anyone, and it’s a hair’s breadth away from swatting them, or stalking them down and doing the deed with their bare hands.

        I really don’t want this to be like how the boomers climbed into prosperity and then pulled the ladder up behind them so hardly anyone else will ever have half a hope of ever affording a house ever again or something… but… the barriers to entry on cyberspace need to be reinforced. Badly. I’m no fan of all the rest of the fascistic shit in Ender’s Game or the rest of its author’s backward barbaric dogshit rhetoric, but one thing it might’ve gotten right was envisioning a version of a global communications network where only LICENSED ADULTS have access.

        I don’t think centralized control would go over well because that would be ripe for authoritarian abuse… but maybe some sort of pseudonymous situation where the identity you create online is supposed to be separate from your real self, albeit with a kind of reputation system for rules enforcement so if someone is engaging in socially deleterious behavior they can potentially be saddled with a ruined reputation as a deterrent. Maybe you can create a new identity, but you’d have to build your reputation from scratch, and if people can prove that you’re associated with another extant account all its reputational baggage can get lumped onto your new one in an instant. The point being: to incentivize discretion and decorum.

        I dunno. Just spitballing.

    • nitefox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure twitter is soo bad cause all the teens, not some weird boomers who enjoy throwing shit at each other

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a parent, but I don’t have all the answers to this. But I will say that if you never let them use social media until they’re 18 and legally independent, then you never have the opportunity to teach them how to use it wisely and supervise their usage of it for a time. Just turning 18 doesn’t make you immune to its ill effects. I’m reminded of the really sheltered kids who landed in college and lost their minds on drugs and drink because they’d been so strictly forbidden for so long, and then all those controls were suddenly removed at once. That’s not always the best.