• kattenluik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This argument was never about invading privacy not being a bad thing? It was about the racism and such comment the other commenter made?

    • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My dude, do you have amnesia?

      I’d like to point out that they said nothing about it being a bad thing and that all they did was say it was Chinese-owned, hence making your comment a pointless attack of nonsense.

      They were very clearly implying that being Chinese-owned is a bad thing (because of the privacy implications), which is the opposite of what you said.

      • kattenluik
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to stop replying now because this is going nowhere, but no that is not what I said and I really don’t know what to tell you. You’re missing key things here about the intention and tone of my comment and the one I replied to.

        • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe you’d like to attempt again to explain what you meant? Because you have already confirmed my understanding was correct.