I’m sorry if I’m replying to the wrong comment, but I’m just going to respond to this most recent one.
Chuck Schumer was originally mentioned because in your initial comment, it seemed as though you were only linking ‘crazy’ Republicans to the topic. We were pointing out that this is the most bipartisan issue to date.
I’m not sure what there is to defend on our end. Are you implying that anyone who believes E.T. is behind UAP is crazy? Do you have a specific reason for thinking that those who believe in this hypothesis are irrational? It’s just one of many hypotheses, and perhaps not even the most ‘crazy’ one by your definition.
Have you checked any links in the sidebar such as uap.guide and some of the cases listed here? I’m curious as to what you think is behind the Phenomenon?
Edit: Corrected some punctuation.
Edit edit: A more comprehensive post that lays out a lot of cases for skeptics such as yourself to look at.
Just realized you were one of the people who brought up Schumer…
No wonder you took it personal, and now can’t defend it.
I’m sorry if I’m replying to the wrong comment, but I’m just going to respond to this most recent one.
Chuck Schumer was originally mentioned because in your initial comment, it seemed as though you were only linking ‘crazy’ Republicans to the topic. We were pointing out that this is the most bipartisan issue to date.
I’m not sure what there is to defend on our end. Are you implying that anyone who believes E.T. is behind UAP is crazy? Do you have a specific reason for thinking that those who believe in this hypothesis are irrational? It’s just one of many hypotheses, and perhaps not even the most ‘crazy’ one by your definition.
Have you checked any links in the sidebar such as uap.guide and some of the cases listed here? I’m curious as to what you think is behind the Phenomenon?
Edit: Corrected some punctuation.
Edit edit: A more comprehensive post that lays out a lot of cases for skeptics such as yourself to look at.