• Froyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So any Miramax film made during Weinstein’s tenure should be shunned. Got it.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Miramax_films – So you know what all you’re stating, he’s every film they’ve been involved in.
    Any time Weinstein’s name shows up in a credit on a movie/tv, he gets a residual. His are probably forced to go to his victim fund. Smith is donating his residuals from that era to “Women in Film”, voluntarily.

    Miramax and Weinstein broke up BTW. Weinstein only holds the rights to Dogma, Miramax still owns the rest. Smiths’ current production company is Lionsgate. While Lionsgate’s subsidiary Spyglass bought most of the Weinstein Company catalog, they are not owned/operated by Weinstein.

    People are multi-faceted. I believe Smith when he said he “didn’t know THAT person” when speaking of Harvey. Smith probably viewed him the same way you would a priest. I’m certain that pedophile priests aren’t acting all pedophily during Sunday Services. Again, you’re logic is that we should burn down the church because a priest couldn’t stop being hands-on with the altar boys.
    Harvey Weinstein didn’t create the characters or write the script. He didn’t direct the movies. He wrote numbers and signed the check.

    Show me anything stating that Weinstein owns more than Dogma.

    Miramax produced the following:
    October 11, 2002 Pokémon 4Ever

    I guess that means that Ash needs to be held to account for Weinstein’s transgressions, right?