• God@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But that’s not being anti, just accepting the possibility of it. Like i consider myself a libertarian and if you wanna make it close source, ok, I may dislike it but I won’t regulate against it. But being anti would imply I would go out of my way to censor your ability to do close source.

    • lntl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a GPL license thing. If you make a derivative work of GPL code, you’re NOT free to do what you want with it. This is where the 'anti come from.

      • God@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah. Well I’m pro theft so just use it and close it if you want and pray for the best! Hide the evidence to not get sued.

        • lntl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This happens from time to time. The offending party either removes the GPL code or they GPL the work. That’s life ;)

              • God@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You don’t need to rewrite it though. Just keep it closed source and import / copy paste whatever you want into your repo.

                • lntl@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s may be possible to tell if there is GPL code included whether or not the source is reveal. A simple example is that some plain-text strings are visible in compiled binaries. In this way, poking around with a hexeditor may reveal strings which indicate part of the code is GPL.

                  • God@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Hmmm. Thankfully I only develop small services and haven’t done any big monolith that people wanna audit. When I get to that point I’ll prolly get sued and then try to figure out what to do while profusely apologizing and denying at the same time.

      • sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are two parts to this. On one side, you have the “please follow the GPL if you’re using GPL code” – which is really just asking someone to honor a contract, more or less.

        Then you have people like RMS, who believe that there should not be such a thing as proprietary software. They don’t care if you aren’t using the GPL – no software should be proprietary, period.

        • lntl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I admire that RMS has a vision for the world and fights for it. World needs more people like this.