Apple users bash new iPhone 15: ‘Innovation died with Steve Jobs’::Smart phone fans are griping about Apple’s new devices since the arguably anti-climactic announcement of the forthcoming iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus on Tuesday.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Imagine a world where we accept that things don’t have to be fantastically better than what came before, and we can find happiness in what we have.

          • lorez@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yup. All this technological advancement is cos we’re never really satisfied of what we have. Was it good in the 80s, was it enough? No. We never settle. That one day will be our ruin.

  • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I don’t know what people are expecting anymore, phones are a mature market. Short of something like foldables (which don’t seem to be catching on) they’re going to be iterative updates. Look at TVs and computers. Years of big advancements and then they’re iterative.

    Also the NY Post is an absolutely terrible publication to link to.

      • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I got my fold because I was tired of incremental upgrades that didn’t make my phone feel any different than the last years phone (moved from Pixel 2 to pixel 3 right prices dropped when as pixel 6 launched). Sure it was faster but it didn’t feel any faster than when the old phone was new. The screen was the same size, it felt the same speed, why even spend the money? I wouldn’t pitch that anyone needs a foldable, but by that comparison noone “needs” a $1600 ultra/pro phone when base models are $800-900, but people do anyway. As long as I can afford the upgrade every 3 years, I will get the new one. when the screen finally gives.

    • Kaffemannen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      (almost) fully agree. However, I think people are just waiting for the next “game changer” since it’s been quite long since the “smartphone” was launched… and as you say, foldables obviolsy didn’t fill that desire. Computers, on the other hand, has seen some quite big improvements lately. Mainly with small, energy efficient chips (like the m1, m2…) so there is hope for a not so stagnant market with only marginal gains.

    • Meganium97@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean I’d agree but apple consistently jacks up the prices with every “new” release. I’m going to assume that the 15 is literally just the 14 with usb c.

  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Steve Jobs didn’t innovate a thing in his life. Apple has always been stealing tech and pretending that they created it.

    Now with this new version, they don’t even have much anything to steal. At best, they pretended that the EU didn’t force them to adopt USB 3 and boast how much faster it is than Lightning port.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Actually the EU only forced them to adopt USB C. Only their ‘Pro’ model actually has USB 3. Imagine having to pay a premium for the luxury of a 15 year old technology

      • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Apple just wants to get rid of low income people having an iphone.

        Iphones whole thing has always been to be a luxury brand, that only rich people can afford.

    • Xia@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah because the first iPhone wasn’t a Revolution,

        • June@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          i was working in mobile at the time, and it was my job to keep up with the leading tech. i was using a Palm Treo when the iPhone was released, which was arguably the most advanced PDA phone at the time with blackberry being the primary competitor.

          i vividly remember watching the announcement from the iphone and being shaken with how the device worked. the fact that you interact with it without a stylus, the highest resolution screen available on a PDA phone, combining the functionality of an ipod, phone, and rich HTML internet browsing device, and the fucking triple layered capacitive multi-touch touch screen were absolutely revolutionary. to say anything else is revisionist history. no one else had anything remotely like it.

          and anyone who knew anything about mobiles at the time knew it was revolutionary and that the world was changing that day.

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Their Laptop Chips are in fact leading technology. Intel and AMD are far behind in Performance/Power used

      • nxdefiant@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        You’re correct, but it’s important to note that the M chips are very expensive to produce, and abandoning x86 means literally all the software iOS and OSX uses needs to be rewritten (or translated via Rosetta). It’s a huge project with tons of risks and massive costs. Apple can do this because they’re pretty much completely vertically integrated at this point, and control their ecosystem completely. If amd independently released some new non compatible architecture that was dramatically faster, it’d likely be dead in the water.

        Intel learned this lesson the hard way during the Itanic days. AMD took the relatively safer approach when they released amd64.

        • Johanno@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Correct. I wish there were open source chips in this category. Not that anyone could afford to produce it, but I believe Software for a chip with a new instruction set would be more adapted if you could look everything up

          • sndrtj
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            RISC-V is open source. Lots of boards are moving to RISC-V.

      • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        ‘Good artists copy; great artists steal’ -Steve Jobs, proudly bragging about stealing ideas.

        Such as the mouse which they stole from Xerox. There are many examples of this for people who don’t have apple dick in their mouths

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Remember when they stole MacOS from…

        XWindows? Was that what you were going to say?

        Yeah remember when they stole the click wheel concept from…

        Wow, you are really digging the bottom of the barrel…

      • bigschnitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Apple was literally founded and initially successful off Steve jobs monetizing Woz’s genius. It is not at all a stretch to claim Steve Jobs never innovated a thing.

        In modern apple, of course they are far more likely to buy innovative technologies and fund development or copy competitors. Why would they spend money funding R&D when they can more cheaply buy out worthwhile concepts?

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        There is no such thing as ‘lightning speed’. It’s just a connector, not a data communication standard. The non-pro iPhone 15 uses the same SoC as last year’s pro models, which happens to have an USB 2.0 controller. The new SoC used in the 15 Pro models have a 10 gbit USB 3.0 controller on board.

        • TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          “Still limited to the same speed of the model using the lightning connector” did not have the same ring to it.

          Did not know they finally moved to a usb3 chipset on the pro when I commented, good to hear.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I only hear: „mimimi, apple does not give me any reason to buy a new phone every year.“ just use your phone 5 years and try a new one then you will feel the difference. Source: I own a iPhone X and my girlfriend owns a iPhone 12 pro

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s better for the environment anyway. Regardless of manufacturer. There’s also almost no need to get a new device every year. Marginal hardware upgrades mean very little to average consumer, it’s just a numbers race and most people don’t really take their devices to the edge of performance.

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You don’t buy Apple products for the technology or innovations anymore, now you buy Apple products for the bragging rights of being able to pay premium prices for things everyone else has been using for a decade that have a lot more features for a fraction of the price.

    • DarkWasp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is a take I would expect to see on Reddit, it’s simply not true. None of those devices run iOS either which is what a lot of people prefer. It’s okay to dislike something, you don’t need to insult the people that do.

    • mplewis@lemmy.globe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      10 months ago

      Premium Android phones are just as expensive as iPhones and come with worse software quality and shorter support periods.

      • nostradiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        $Maybe in the us but elsewhere the apple prices are nuts. I bought new s23 for 800$. There is no fucking way I’d pay 1200$ for much worse iphone.

      • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Except you can buy a pixel A series which will work just as well as the most expensive iPhone just slightly slower. I’m at about 3.5 years on a $350 pixel and still it’s the best phone I’ve owned. Yes I know you can buy cheaper iPhones too but aren’t they phasing that out? Like you now normally would have to buy a 1-2 year old model to get a price similar to that. My pixel was brand new and 4-5 months past release I think

        • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The bugs on the PIxel 6 (returned after 2 weeks) and now with Android 12 on a Oneplus phone have me seriously thinking of buying an Iphone next time. Despite the fact I’d rather stay with Android, I’d make the switch and pay $300 more every three years for a phone that is relatively trouble free with decent support.

  • Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ngl they kinda are right. The last time I saw a feature that made me consider them was maybe like 4-6 years ago. I still bloody love Ipods tho.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Eh. I mean, are there any great innovations left when it comes to smartphones? They kinda all just look and do the same nowadays.

    They sure made USB3 look like a breakthrough innovation, though…

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      are there any great innovations left

      Honestly, this is such a weird take because, yes. Of course there are innovations left, you just cannot think of them yourself now because then they obviously would not be innovative but rather same old same old. Now the rate of new innovations probably did slow down a lot, I agree with that, so its harder to find something that is innovative in this space.

  • Skkorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Apple fans are delusional, the iPhone has always don’t tiny ass incremental changes. This is par for the course.

  • Four_lights77@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    The iPhone is their cash cow. They need it to bring stable and sizeable income to fund things like vr goggles. I’m not saying the haters are wrong, just that their expectations for what Apple will innovate on the iPhone might be a little misplaced.

  • Amilo1591@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Leave it to Apple to release a new iPhone with intentionally outdated, hamstrung technology just to upsell more expensive models.

    My 2013 Samsung had usb 3, used a special micro USB 3 cable but still.

    • Fredol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s shocking that they’re so openly scamming their customers. Base models comes with last’s year chip and features. Has a gimped USB 2.0 port for maybe a 5$ difference. It’s a total insult.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    It died long before Steve Jobs did. Steve straight up fought tooth and nail to keep superior emerging technologies like OLED off new iPhone’s.

    • jimbolauski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Steve’s big computer innovation was fanless design. Apple had to design custom power supplies with custom voltages and custom motherboards. Then the power supplies started overheating and failing after a couple years the replacement power supply was 500 when a normal power supply was 100.

  • MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just miss all the backwards comparability Jobs used to maintain. When he was driving the bus, he may have been a complete asshole, but he made sure a 12 year old mac computer could still work with the new tech, as best as it could.

    Snow Leopard was the last, glorious OSX that was secure (enough), and very malleable.

    Now? I want to dump their whole ecosystem.