• Feirdro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My thought, too. It seems like a sensible measure. Any one smarter than me want to ELI5 why rate limits are bad?

    • SuperSleuth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The end goal of a social media platform is for users to use your platform. You want them engaging with content and ads. Rate limits are actually quite sensible if you want to prevent bots or data scraping, but the Twitter is being far too restrictive.

      Lots of people are claiming to get rate limited after a few minutes of normal scrolling. Which makes me think these limits include replies as well. Realistically your not scrolling through, and Twitter isn’t loading 600 posts for a least a couple hours. Even then, do you not want people using your platform?

      • Feirdro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they’re including replies, isn’t that’s one Taylor swift tweet?

        Thanks, makes a lot more sense now.