Alef Aeronautics’ ‘Model A’ has a driving range of 200 miles and a flight range of 110 miles. The company plans to start delivering cars by late 2025.

  • ExpensiveConstant@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will you also need a pilots license to purchase? I wonder where you would even be allowed to transition from driving to flying…

    • swope@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you drive too far forward in a parking space and grind on the parking block, or someone dings your door, do you need an A&P to repair it?

    • Lantech@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Driving down the highway, hit a traffic jam. Don’t even slow down just go airborne over the jam.

      • numbscroll@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Lantech

        @Ragnell @ExpensiveConstant

        Aside from the $300k price tag, sadly….

        The car will be a Low Speed Vehicle, meaning it won’t go faster than about 25 miles per hour on a paved surface. If a driver needs a faster route, they will be able to use the vehicle’s flight capabilities, according to Alef.

        • Hellsadvocate@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          People’s driving senses are so fucking bad, I can’t imagine them flying. It’ll be in the news often I guess “car crashes into building while trying to back up.” “car flies into power lines thousands without power” well I guess that’s fairly typical already.

        • assbutt@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          What the hell is the point of a car that can’t do more than 25 mph? This thing can fucking fly, but it’s as capable as a golf cart on the ground?

          I’ll believe this when it actually exists (the thing they’re promising, not a skeletal prototype), and I’ll believe that the FAA is cool with flying cars when I see them on my commute. None of this currently passes the bullshit check.

          • TheDeadGuy@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I imagine that it’s supposed to be flown and is only temporarily used on the ground. Same way airplanes don’t have a higher ground speed

              • TheDeadGuy@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Lol ok true, I meant more of a maneuvering at speed. Even then, thinking about it my analogy is terrible :/

            • assbutt@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              K well there are a few key differences between cars and airplanes… If planes could drive around on the road, nobody would buy a car. That’s kinda the whole goddamn point, that’s why people want a car that can fly.

              I take issue with a “flying car” that’s not a fucking car. What the hell is the point? If you’re spending $300k, why wouldn’t you actually become a pilot instead of buying some half-baked car that isn’t actually usable as a car?

        • deaconblue@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s mostly an expensive toy. They made it VTOL so it does not have to go fast enough on the ground to become airborne. That’s ok, it doesn’t need a runway to take off, but VTOL is way to make things fly that really have no business flying. Airplanes have a certain shape because they have to. This thing looks like a bar of soap in comparison. I’m sure it uses a ton of energy to stay airborne, it would have the glide coefficient of a rock.

          • assbutt@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is a ridiculous comment. Are you intentionally missing the point? Why are you applying airplane design principles to a car? It’s not a plane…it’s a car.

            Glide coefficient? In what scenario do you imagine this car gliding? Do you see wings? They didn’t “make it VTOL” because they couldn’t design a functional airplane, they designed it as a VTOL from day one because a flying car that isn’t VTOL capable wouldn’t be viable. The very concept of a flying car is based on VTOL. It can only work as a car if it’s VTOL. A fixed-wing flying car would be asinine, where the hell do you expect people to take off?

            Look I am not a supporter of this thing. It has too many glaring issues, like the fact that it doesn’t currently exist. You cannot, however, criticize this vehicle based on its merits as an airplane, because it’s not an airplane.

            • fishos@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              You ABSOLUTELY can criticize it as an airplane. It’s a vehicle that flys. And as a VTOL, it doesn’t have much if any of a glide coefficient like deaconblue said. Which is extremely relevant if power goes out and instead of being able to glide to safety, it just falls like a rock on whatever is below. Saying “its a VTOL, so it doesn’t matter” puts you on the same safety standards as that submarine guy.

              • assbutt@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Okay, then I’m going to criticize you as an airplane. You’re a fucking piece of shit airplane, dude. You don’t even have wings, what the fuck are you doing? You can’t produce thrust, you can’t generate lift, what good are you as an airplane? Get outta here, stop wasting everyone’s time.

                See how fuckin’ stupid that was?

                Yes, there is an inherent risk associated with aircraft that cannot glide. What’s your point? Cars can’t have wings, it simply isn’t viable, so what do you propose? You want them to design a car-shaped object that can magically glide without wings? Think about it for more than a second and you’ll see the issue there. What you’re suggesting cannot exist within the currently-understood laws of physics. In order for flying cars to become reality, there is a certain level of risk that must be accepted.

                Saying “its a VTOL, so it doesn’t matter” puts you on the same safety standards as that submarine guy.

                You don’t know a fucking thing about me, so how about we steer clear of character assumptions? Maybe show me the courtesy of just arguing facts on this one?

                That guy knowingly and intentionally broke all of the rules. That’s not what I’m talking about. I’m not suggesting any rules be broken or any safety standards be forsaken, I’m simply pointing out that you cannot judge this concept based on a fundamentally different type of aircraft.

                It’s a vehicle that flys.

                Ever seen a fuckin’ helicopter? Hot air balloon? Blimp? Turns out there’s more than one way to get and remain airborne. Think…

            • deaconblue@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your name is well chosen. I think you just wasted a lot of time essentially making the same points I did.

              • assbutt@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Reading comprehension has always been a struggle for you, I take it. It does not matter how it compares to an airplane, because it is not an airplane. It’s not a boat either, you imbecile, do we need to dissect that one as well?

    • agamemnonymous@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      What about insurance flying low over populated regions? Air traffic control? I don’t think the physical flying capability is the problem with flying cars

      • Ragnell@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’ll probably use VFR rules, like a helicopter. I’m thinking the target is rich guys who eventually get pilot licenses.