RaoulDuke@lemmy.nzM to NZ Politics@lemmy.nzEnglish · 1 year agoGangs to face 'tougher consequences' under National Party Government - Christopher Luxonwww.newshub.co.nzexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkGangs to face 'tougher consequences' under National Party Government - Christopher Luxonwww.newshub.co.nzRaoulDuke@lemmy.nzM to NZ Politics@lemmy.nzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareflambonkscious@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI think it’s probably worth a go given how ineffectual we’ve been… Certainly worth assessing or experimenting with the constraints/requirements to focus how it can be applied
minus-squareDave@lemmy.nzMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoYeah, after having this conversation I’ve wondered why parties aren’t promising this. I think National want to be seen to be tough on crime. If they remove crime then they lose a voterbase. If Labour do this then it might be seen as a National-type hard on crime move, which could lose voters.
I think it’s probably worth a go given how ineffectual we’ve been…
Certainly worth assessing or experimenting with the constraints/requirements to focus how it can be applied
Yeah, after having this conversation I’ve wondered why parties aren’t promising this.
I think National want to be seen to be tough on crime. If they remove crime then they lose a voterbase.
If Labour do this then it might be seen as a National-type hard on crime move, which could lose voters.