Not that you haven’t had this explained to you repeatedly, but… thats not how the burden of proof works.
Example:
If I say “zephyreks is an unrepentant kisser of billionaire toes,” then I should be the one to provide proof of toe kissing. It’s not on you to prove that you don’t kiss billionaire toes.
In the article, the author makes a claim. They do not back up the claim with evidence. They dong do so, they should expect to be criticized for it.
Not that you haven’t had this explained to you repeatedly, but… thats not how the burden of proof works.
Example:
If I say “zephyreks is an unrepentant kisser of billionaire toes,” then I should be the one to provide proof of toe kissing. It’s not on you to prove that you don’t kiss billionaire toes.
In the article, the author makes a claim. They do not back up the claim with evidence. They dong do so, they should expect to be criticized for it.