If video surveillance of educators and administrators admitting to injecting propaganda into their curricula is not “proof” then you surely would look for a second opinion to confirm your bias : you absolute dullard.
So I see no reason to believe anything they present. Why should I take a proven liar’s word for anything? “It’s on video?” Great. Do they show the context? No.
This is your one and only chance to stop insulting me before I end this conversation and block you. This is not Reddit and I will not put up with such incivility.
If Project Veritas showed “proof” water was wet, I’d get two other opinions.
Uh, okay buddy. Great job adding nothing new.
If video surveillance of educators and administrators admitting to injecting propaganda into their curricula is not “proof” then you surely would look for a second opinion to confirm your bias : you absolute dullard.
Video from the group that constantly deceptively edits video? Yeah, again, are you shitting us?
Removed by mod
Are you claiming they don’t deceptively edit footage?
Literally the second sentence of their Wikipedia entry says so.
So I see no reason to believe anything they present. Why should I take a proven liar’s word for anything? “It’s on video?” Great. Do they show the context? No.
Removed by mod
This is your one and only chance to stop insulting me before I end this conversation and block you. This is not Reddit and I will not put up with such incivility.
HAHAAHAHAHAHA I really cannot believe you’ve made this threat. I wish I was an naive and silly as you!
Removed by mod
I really hope you realize that their Wikipedia entry has many, many sources attached to it to back up that claim.
If you truly don’t believe footage can be deceptively edited, I got some bridges to sell you