• Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not eugenics, it’s voluntary extinctionism.

    “Don’t worry guys, that person doesn’t represent us - what they should have said is that they wish for all of humanity to die out.”

    This is an absolutely insane thing to advocate for. I hope you come to realize that in time.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      According to some predictions, climate change will cause up to 3 billion refugees by the end of the century. The world isn’t exactly the most stable right now either, in part due to the beginning effects of climate change.

      Not that I necessarily agree with it, but coming to the conclusion that it’s not necessarily moral to bring a child into that world or contribute to further suffering, isn’t particularly insane or inhumane.

      It’s not a particularly novel or outlandish idea either. From Sophocles to Shakespeare. To be or not to be, is an age old question.

      Not that going on about how much you hate children and people who have children all day on the internet, is a particularly healthy hobby, obviously.

      • OurTragicUniverse@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        According to some predictions, climate change will cause up to 3 billion refugees by the end of the century.

        Those are some very optimistic predictions.

        Here are some fun links from the World Economic Forum and the United Nations: Global freshwater demand will exceed supply 40% by 2030 and 90% of global top soil and arable land is at risk of depletion by 2050.

        And to add to all this, the ice caps will likely be melted completely in the next decade causing the Blue Ocean Event, where massive amounts of previously reflected solar radiation will instead be absorbed by the oceans, causing the release of huge amounts of methane from the sea bed and the earth to cook in it’s own atmosphere.

        This is a good explanation for anyone interested in further reading on the BOE. Look this up for yourselves with other sources though.
        (You’ll want to find out how much ice coverage is left at the poles, how much we’ve lost this year so far, and the loss projection for if the next 5 years are as hot as 2023. Then look up what will happen to the earth with all the unreflected solar radiation we’ll be absorbing without the ice caps).

        Billions of people are going to die in the next 30 years due to climate collapse. There may not be 3 billion of us left to be clinate refugees by the end of the century.

    • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying we should kill people, I’m saying making more is wrong.

      It is a nonconsensual act whereupon you are forcing life and all its travesty onto another being, when they were perfectly fine not existing.

      Call me insane if you want, I couldn’t care less. Humans are a plague upon both other humans and this planet as a whole, and bringing someone else into the world to be both a victim and perpetrator of the issue is wrong.

      • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think your perspective about life is blinded by pessimism, and you’re treating that pessimism as absolute fact. Many people view life as a wonderful thing, are thrilled to exist for the time that they do, and see creating a new life to experience the wonders of living as a gift.

        Humans are a plague upon both other humans and this planet as a whole

        You’re sounding like Agent Smith from the matrix. Come on. Unplug from the negative feedback loop for a bit.

        • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          You call it pessimism, I call it realism.

          There are good things to experience, yes. If you’re already alive, then by all means, seek to find happiness and enjoyment. Don’t force someone else into that endless struggle. You can make no guarantees that their life won’t be one of pure suffering, and that’s not a risk I’m willing to take.

          And again, we are destroying this planet - not just for us, but for all life on it. We are the problem.

          • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            You call it pessimism, I call it realism.

            Says every person with depression ever.

            I agree with the other commenter recommending therapy. When you don’t see it as “life is pain and the future is hopeless”, you might sound less like a scifi villain calling for human extinction.

            • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Existence is suffering” is a foundational tenet for many worldviews and religions, not just antinatalism. Existence is literally the first cause to all suffering - no existence, no suffering.

              Acknowledging that doesn’t make me depressed or pessimistic, it’s just acceptance how things are.

              You’re free to live in whatever fantasy you want, though. That’s your right.

              Also, responding to differing worldviews with “get help” is generally bad form

              • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your worldview is literally calling for the extinction of all humans. You need to come back to reality and stop convincing yourself that this is normal or healthy.

                • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, it is. And I’m just fine, I prefer not to live in idealistic delusion

                  Maybe educate yourself on the actual philosophy

                  • Lt. Worf, son of Mogh@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Ah, yes the classic “everyone else who doesn’t subscribe is deluded” echochamber red flag.

                    “Voluntary Extinction” is right up there with “flat earthers” and “anti-vax” as the dumbest pseudo-intellectual things I’ve read on the internet.

                • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Without any sort of guarantee.

                  It’s a gamble. Literally gambling with human lives.

                  If one never exists, they face neither pleasure nor pain. If one is forced to exist - remember, this is never consensual - then one may experience pleasure and pain, and simply hope that pleasure is more bountiful. Hopes, dreams, goals, ideas that may or may not be met. All of it essentially left to chance. Will their life be pleasurable? Possibly. Will life be painful? Certainly. Suffering is guaranteed. Pleasure is not. Are we to keep forcing others to play, simply in the hope that things work out well for them?

                  No. I don’t gamble with lives. Nor should anyone.

      • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why stop at humans? Ducks are pretty reprehensible as well.

        And the less said about koalas, the better.

        • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humans are the primary cause for global suffering. Ducks are pretty fucked tho, they could probably go as well.

          Mosquitoes I shouldn’t even have to mention. I think we can all agree those fuckers need to go

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude if people really have such a problem with life, they can in fact opt out of it at pretty much any point down the line.

          • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah but like, why not let those with the best understanding of the particular circumstances make that decision on a case-by-case basis instead of unilaterally saying that because some people are probably going to have a shitty life no one gets to make more (people)?

        • BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          If someone experiences so much suffering that they are pushed to “opt out of it”, it would have been better not to force them to live and experience the suffering in the first place. Just because someone can take themselves out of it doesn’t make the suffering okay to inflict.

          • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, and I think that is bad. I just also think that this isn’t because of anything intrinsic to being alive and/or autistic, but largely due to external factors.

            • OurTragicUniverse@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And what control do we have over these external factors? Because it sounds like you’re basically summing this up as ‘skill issue’, you get that right?

              Victim blaming autistic people who commit suicide is a great look on you. You should be so proud of this line of reasoning.

              • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah righto bud, I’m not victim blaming anybody. I’m just shit-talking a bunch of sad defeatists on the internet who think they’re smarter than everybody else just because they’ve taken the fucking blackpill when in reality they’re so far down this hole that they’re running defense for fucking eugenics against their own community.

                On the off chance that you were being sincere in your question as to what we can do to actually improve the situation, the answer is to participate in an existing community dedicated to that very purpose. Collective action is generally way more effective than anything an individual can do. Are there barriers to doing this? Potentially. What can you do about that? I guess you’ll just have to figure it out; I don’t fucking know the specific circumstances of your personal situation, nor those of any groups around you.

                • OurTragicUniverse@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  So what are you doing? I mean aside from making lots of silly assumptions about me and the other people here who are politely trying to explain our points of view about this.

                  How are you making the world better for people with autism? And how many kids do you plan on having? Any plans for how you and all the kids will cope with the water and food shortages over the next ten to thirty years?

                  Genuinely asking here.

                  • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What the fuck do you want from me? I don’t owe you shit. You asked a question I suspected and am now convinced was in bad faith, and I answered it anyway.

                    You’re talking a lot of shit about me making baseless assumptions for somebody out here asking questions that are entirely premised on baseless assumptions yourself, such as (wrongly) assuming not only that I’m capable of having children (I intentionally had my gonads removed, not that it’s any of your business) but also that I’d want to (children have a tendency to be noisy, outgoing and energetic in a way that doesn’t jive with my own autism). I just don’t have a problem with people who genuinely believe that they can give their children a good life having any, as I’m not convinced that a good life is impossible (yet).

                    Piss off with your bullshit “politely trying to explain our points of view” civility politics, we were past that when you took the least charitable interpretation you could have done and misconstrued my point of view as somehow placing blame on the victims of the current state of affairs.

                    Genuinely asking here.

                    nonono: you’re “Just Asking Questions.” At least, I believe that’s the vernacular.

                    My position is simple: for as long as there is any positive experience to be had, life can be worthwhile and it’s not up to anyone to make a decision based on the contrary view to that on the behalf of anyone else. Also eugenics is fucking vile.

        • GreenMario@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So if your kid doesn’t want to fight in the water wars you’re just gonna say “lol kys nerd”? Tragic.

          • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Firstly, I don’t have a kid. Being sterile (and also just not wanting any), I am quite unlikely to ever have a kid. Ideally we as a society would work to avoid water wars happening. My point is that we should improve our collective state of affairs somewhat, rather than resigning ourselves to the idea that to exist is to suffer like a bunch of loser doomers.

            • GreenMario@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              There’s no fixing to this shit and deep down you know this.

              I saw how humanity got together to deal with COVID. Spoiler: they fucking didn’t.

              What a garbage species we are.