• night_of_knee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because Israel already occupies Gaza and other Palestinian areas.

    Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, where the hell are you getting your information?

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Israel still controls all traffic, imports, utilities, and ingress/egress from the area (if it didn’t, they wouldn’t have been able to cut off power, water, and aid). Israel “withdrawing from Gaza” doesn’t really mean much unless Gaza has elected representation and can sustain itself.

      • samokosik@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Gaza literally has a border with egypt and sea.

        In addition, controlling imports and exports is fully reasonable when there is a terrorist organization in power.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s funny because your comment is literally meaningless. Which terrorist organization are you referring to? Hamas or Israel?

            • Zoolander@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              False. There are 2. One has killed about 1400 people, the other has killed over 8000 in the last week alone.

              • samokosik@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Hamas is the terrorist organization in the conflict. Who else? Israel? Not really, they literally were the ones attacked and at the same time it’s pretty much the only state in middle east where people have human rights. There is no oppression from the government (despite the fact I personally disagree with many decisions of the current leadership), there are regular elections, etc. I don’t see how this is a terrorist behavior.

                There is a huge difference when you purposefully just because of their religion and when you kill civilians because there are terrorists hiding between them.

                • Zoolander@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t care what their reasons for killing children are. I only care that they are indiscriminately killing them. That makes them terrorists by any definition.

                  • samokosik@lemmynsfw.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    But you should. Because that’s the difference between people being killed by a terrorist attack and people being killed while chasing terrorists.