• narwhal@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While whether LLMs are intelligent or not is still hotly debated. I think the author’s thoughts are very interesting.

    This is crazy to me. You can read in a stream of meaningless numbers (tokens) and incidentally build a reasonably accurate model of the real things those tokens represent.

    The implications are vast. We may be able to translate between languages that have never had a “Rosetta Stone”. Any animals that have a true language could have it decoded. And while an LLM that’s gotten an 8 year old’s understanding of balancing assorted items isn’t that useful, an LLM that’s got a baby whale’s grasp on whale language would be revolutionary.

    • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      LLMs can’t do any of those things though…

      If no one teaches them how to speak a dead language, they won’t be able to translate it. LLMs require a vast corpus of language data to train on and, for bilingual translations, an actual Rosetta stone (usually the same work appearing in multiple languages).

      This problem is obviously exacerbated quite a bit with animals, who, definitionally, speak no human language and have very different cognitive structures to humans. It is entirely unclear if their communications can even be called language at all. LLMs are not magic and cannot render into human speech something that was never speech to begin with.

      The whole article is just sensationalism that doesn’t begin to understand what LLMs are or what they’re capable of.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are making sense of a language without a rosetta stone. The English llm talk is learned from English.

        Now the corpus is a big work to do. But still.

        • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, they learn English (or any other language) from humans. Translation requires a Rosetta Stone and LLMs are still much worse at such tasks than dedicated translation programs.

          Edit: I guess if you are suggesting that the LLM could become an LLM of the dead language and communicate only in said dead language, that is indeed possible. Since users would need to speak that dead language to communicate with it though I don’t understand the utility of such a thing (and is certainly not what the author meant anyway).

      • narwhal@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What about preserving languages that are close to extinct, but still have language data available? Can LLMs help in this case?

        • ImpossibilityBox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Preservation only but not likely any better than a linguistic historian.

          But it gets tricky because LLMs only function on HUGE sets of data. LLMs are nothing more than complicated probability engines. Give it the question “What color is the sky?” and the math extracted from the massive databases that it has says the highest probability answer is “Blue”. It doesn’t actually KNOW the answer it just knows the probabilities of different words.

          Without large amounts of data on the dying language current gen LLM’s won’t be accurate or able to generate reliable answers. Shoot… LLMs can barely generate reliable answers with the massive datasets they currently have.

          I strongly recommend anyone even remotely interested in LLMs to read this interactive article:

          https://ig.ft.com/generative-ai/

        • PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocksB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

          this

          Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

          I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

        • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is so funny, I know him personally; we went to school together. I’ll watch it and comment later.