In a recent interview, Dr. James Lacatski, who headed a prior U.S. government investigation into Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), affirmed that the U.S. government possesses a craft of unknown origin and has access to its interior.
Between this statement and what Grusch was cleared to discuss, it could suggest that admitting to UAP/NHI may be on a roadmap. However, I think at the end of the day, the biggest thing the government would want to protect is its advantages over other nations. If there is any form of disclosure from the US, the military will do everything in its power to prevent technology and research coming to light. Other countries knowing that we have it is an advantage, but any details beyond that weakens that leg up.
In the recent weaponized podcast they discuss Grusch and one guest in particular goes out of his way to fuel speculation that Grusch believes he’s telling the truth but may have been lied to, possibly by others who are also in the same boat. This has been a consistent narrative. Makes me nervous.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some lies in the info supplied to Grusch. Though it sounds like he spoke with a wide range of people across agencies that would paint the correct picture as a whole. There will be some details that turn out false, so the important thing will be congress and anyone investigating to not give up after a few dead ends.
Congress should also be getting some more details about Grusch’s claims, since they’re now cleared for a SCIF. This should hopefully help get more witnesses or evidence for a future hearing.
Between this statement and what Grusch was cleared to discuss, it could suggest that admitting to UAP/NHI may be on a roadmap. However, I think at the end of the day, the biggest thing the government would want to protect is its advantages over other nations. If there is any form of disclosure from the US, the military will do everything in its power to prevent technology and research coming to light. Other countries knowing that we have it is an advantage, but any details beyond that weakens that leg up.
In the recent weaponized podcast they discuss Grusch and one guest in particular goes out of his way to fuel speculation that Grusch believes he’s telling the truth but may have been lied to, possibly by others who are also in the same boat. This has been a consistent narrative. Makes me nervous.
I wouldn’t be surprised if there were some lies in the info supplied to Grusch. Though it sounds like he spoke with a wide range of people across agencies that would paint the correct picture as a whole. There will be some details that turn out false, so the important thing will be congress and anyone investigating to not give up after a few dead ends.
Congress should also be getting some more details about Grusch’s claims, since they’re now cleared for a SCIF. This should hopefully help get more witnesses or evidence for a future hearing.
Yes, I think the speed with which we see the next closed session and who is called to it will be the next crumb we receive.