haxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agoAnalyzing Data 180,000x Faster with Rustwillcrichton.netexternal-linkmessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyrust@programming.dev
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkAnalyzing Data 180,000x Faster with Rustwillcrichton.nethaxor@derp.fooMB to Hacker News@derp.fooEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.partyrust@programming.dev
minus-squareLimeey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year ago Note: there are lots of ways we could make the Python code faster, but the point of this post isn’t to compare highly-optimized Python to highly-optimized Rust. The point is to compare “standard-Jupyter-notebook” Python to highly-optimized Rust. This is fucking stupid.
minus-squareUnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agothanks, you saved me some time
This is fucking stupid.
thanks, you saved me some time