• Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    An argument against you repeating what I said and agreeing with me?

    No, I stand by what I said and you parroted.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      so… you really do have no argument, huh? You claim that taking state subsidies makes a company state-sponsored.

      I claim that that’s stupid, because it means that Intel and Microsoft would be considered state-sponsored enterprises.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have an argument against my own argument, no.

        Regardless of what you claim I claim, you’ve already taken my side on all of this.

        Thank you for your support!.

            • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So… You don’t have an argument against my argument that isn’t your argument, because you don’t understand the argument?

              • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Incorrect, although you are consistent with your method of pretending someone is saying something they aren’t.

                Thank you for your continued support

                • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You literally claim without evidence that I am using your argument, despite my argument to the contrary. Sounds like a troll who lost an argument to me.

                  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Incorrect.

                    I said that it just because everyone’s acting poorly doesn’t make acting poorly right.

                    I used the example of rape, no matter how many people rape, rape is not okay.

                    You agree with me in your following post, that an act is " either ok or it isn’t."

                    Since you agreed with me and conceded the argument in my favor, I thanked you.

                    Thank you for your support.