Antivirus provider Kaspersky uncovers a sophisticated piece of ‘StripedFly’ malware camouflaged as a cryptocurrency miner that’s been targeting PCs for more than five years.

  • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    From what it’s describing, it sounds like it would only impact Linux computers that allow SMB1 access, such as domain-joined systems with samba access allowed. It sounds like this would target mainly enterprise Linux deployments but home Linux setups should be fine for the most part.

    • Eyron@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      They describe an SSH infector, as well as a credentials scanner. To me, that sounds like it started like from exploited/infected Windows computers with SSH access, and then continued from there.

      With how many unencrypted SSH keys there are, how most hosts keep a list of the servers they SSH into, and how they can probably bypass some firewall protections once they’re inside the network: not a bad idea.

      • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think the original article talked about “spreading” to Linux machines so that generally tracks with what you’re saying that it starts on a Windows machine that itself has access to a Linux machine.

      • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        My job still had Windows 95 machines running just a couple years ago. Could there still be Samba1 running out there or does Linux update differently?

        • lemmyvore
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Of course there is. Unfortunately the average Linux self-hoster doesn’t have much of a clue and probably runs vulnerable Samba (even if it’s not S1). Of course it doesn’t help that Samba seems to get a vulnerability about once a week. It’s one of the most targeted pieces of network software you could run.

          • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I know that Linux is a host of OSs but generally speaking is it up to the user to keep their software up to date or is there some kind of automatic updating process?

            • lemmyvore
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              There are automated updates, especially for security issues, but since Linux users feel they are power users and seldom have to deal with security issues, they often disable updates and do them manually. If and when they remember. And for self-hosted software it’s worst because often they don’t even consider running updates.

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                This depends entirely on the distribution. The distribution I run has no automatic updates by default. I do it manually.

                I could easily set it up if I wanted to, but yeah. There is no consensus, it’s just case-by-case basis. Some do have automatic updates by default.

              • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Some day I’d like to try Linux. Another commentor on another post was telling me about Clover for old Chromebooks. The amount of variety in Linux can be intimidating.

                • lemmyvore
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s an interesting hobby if you get into it. There are hundreds of variations when you count things like distributions, desktop environments and so on, but there’s only a few core mainstream “families” where you get down to it. For something like an old Chromebook it’s basically decided for you since there’s only specific variants made for it.

                  • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Unfortunately I don’t have a lot of hardware to even put Linux on. Talking with the users on the other post piqued my curiosity a little. We’ll see. Thanks for clearing some stuff up for me.

          • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 months ago

            Those machines were controlling a conveyor belt system and weren’t online. I was told the software they were running wasn’t available for other OSs. They were locked in a cabinet. That entire conveyor system is now gone so those machines are probably gone too.

          • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Is there actually still malware floating around out there that targets old Win9x machines? I’d think that without a population of hosts, it’d all die off and nobody is motivated to write more.

        • Toes♀@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah windows 2000 assembly robots, too expensive to replace and too critical to not keep alive.