• Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder if this would end up creating a second parallel PKI. The existing one used for HTTPS security based on Browser’s own trust decisions and CA-Browser forum guidelines. The EIDas one for a “government-approved” checkmark but that doesn’t make the website HTTPS nor have a secure icon.

    • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are already multiple PKI stores on every system, managed by different entities. This is an attempt by demagogues to get around that problem using law to twist their arms.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He’s implying presenting it differently to the user: “secure” and “EU approved”.

        I’m assuming the EU will fight hard to prevent that though.