• FUBAR@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can understand his position though. When the candidate who won the most votes couldn’t win the election. Then why vote?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because you know the rules. It’s arbitrary yes, but in every election except 00 it’s been arbitrary and predefined what the rules are. The best way for the person you want to win to lose it to not vote

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, his position is literally only understandable if you’ve never had a conversation ever with a queer person, a PoC, or a woman who has thoughts other than quiverfull syndrome baby madness.