Rep. Eli Crane used the derogatory phrase in describing his proposed amendment to a military bill. Democratic Rep. Joyce Beatty asked that his words be stricken from the record.

  • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Or you know, he’s talking about actually lowering the standards which is the policy being discussed. Whether or not you think it’s worth lowering admittance standards to allow more women, LGBT, POCs to join and improve diversity, at least be honest with what’s being argued.

    There’s been ongoing debate on lowering standards, mostly for allowing more women into combat roles. While barring these groups entirely from certain roles is obviously wrong, changing and lowering requirements doesn’t seem right either.

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one is lowering standards. Affirmative action means that when all other things are equal, prefer the candidate who is underrepresented in the field.

      • Archpawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How often do they get two candidates that are exactly equal? If they’re giving a benefit to people underrepresented, it needs to be worth something.

        And we’ve been constantly lowering standards, unrelated to affirmative action. There was a time when being a high-school graduate meant something. Now it’s easy to get through college, and completely necessary because if you don’t people will assume you’re the sort of person who can’t even get through college.

      • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is not about affirmative action. There are efforts to lower standards, separate from affirmative action. Maybe not for LGBT or POC but women are held to different physical standards in the military.

        Edit: For Ranger School, standards were lowered so women could graduate. For some positions who cares, but pushing people through positions they aren’t capable for in the name of equality is dangerous both for them and their fellow soldiers

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          but women are held to different physical standards in the military.

          When women can hold combat positions, that might matter.

          • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Women have been allowed in combat positions since around 2015. It’s been a slow integration and there’s very few, because of the exact point I made that the physical standards and training are very difficult for most women.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              So they are held to the same physical standards when it’s a combat position? I’m not seeing the problem then.

              • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                As of right now they are. There are efforts to lower standards to raise numbers, and that is what I’m saying is wrong.

                If they’re held to the same standards, of course that’s not an issue.

                  • Archpawn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It’s not necessarily a bad idea to lower their standards in general, but it seems unfair to reject a man on the basis that he’s too weak when they would have accepted a woman that’s just as strong. If strength matters, then only the few women who are strong enough should be let in. If it doesn’t matter, then men shouldn’t be rejected for not being strong enough.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My guy, the military is nothing but a bunch of people running around in body armor shooting people. The physical requirements for all genders are anachronistic at best.